Laboratory for Control, Learning, and Systems Biology

ISS

2024
  1. L. Cui, Z.P. Jiang, E. D. Sontag, "Small-disturbance input-to-state stability of perturbed gradient flows: Applications to LQR problem", Systems and Control Letters, vol. 188, pp. 105804, 2024. doipdf
    Abstract

    This paper studies the effect of perturbations on the gradient flow of a general constrained nonlinear programming problem, where the perturbation may arise from inaccurate gradient estimation in the setting of data-driven optimization. Under suitable conditions on the objective function, the perturbed gradient flow is shown to be small-disturbance input-to-state stable (ISS), which implies that, in the presence of a small-enough perturbation, the trajectory of the perturbed gradient flow must eventually enter a small neighborhood of the optimum. This work was motivated by the question of robustness of direct methods for the linear quadratic regulator problem, and specifically the analysis of the effect of perturbations caused by gradient estimation or round-off errors in policy optimization. Interestingly, we show small-disturbance ISS for three of the most common optimization algorithms: standard gradient flow, natural gradient flow, and Newton gradient flow.

2022
  1. E.D. Sontag, "Remarks on input to state stability of perturbed gradient flows, motivated by model-free feedback control learning", Systems and Control Letters, vol. 161, pp. 105138, 2022. pdf
    Important: there is an error in the paper. For the LQR application, the paper only shows iISS, not ISS. See the paper "Small-disturbance input-to-state stability of perturbed gradient flows: Applications to LQR problem" for details.
    Abstract

    Recent work on data-driven control and reinforcement learning has renewed interest in a relatively old field in control theory: model-free optimal control approaches which work directly with a cost function and do not rely upon perfect knowledge of a system model. Instead, an "oracle" returns an estimate of the cost associated to, for example, a proposed linear feedback law to solve a linear-quadratic regulator problem. This estimate, and an estimate of the gradient of the cost, might be obtained by performing experiments on the physical system being controlled. This motivates in turn the analysis of steepest descent algorithms and their associated gradient differential equations. This paper studies the effect of errors in the estimation of the gradient, framed in the language of input to state stability, where the input represents a perturbation from the true gradient. Since one needs to study systems evolving on proper open subsets of Euclidean space, a self-contained review of input to state stability definitions and theorems for systems that evolve on such sets is included. The results are then applied to the study of noisy gradient systems, as well as the associated steepest descent algorithms.

2020
  1. E.D. Sontag, "Input-to-State Stability", In Encyclopedia of Systems and Control, pp. 1-9, 2020. pdf
    Abstract

    The notion of input to state stability (ISS) qualitatively describes stability of the mapping from initial states and inputs to internal states (and more generally outputs). This encyclopedia-style article entry gives a brief introduction to the definition of ISS and a discussion of equivalent characterizations. It is an update of the article in the 2015 edition, including additional citations to recent PDE work.

2015
  1. E.D. Sontag, "Input-to-State Stability", In Encyclopedia of Systems and Control, 2015. pdf
    Abstract

    The notion of input to state stability (ISS) qualitatively describes stability of the mapping from initial states and inputs to internal states (and more generally outputs). This entry focuses on the definition of ISS and a discussion of equivalent characterizations.

2012
  1. A. Rufino Ferreira, M. Arcak, E.D. Sontag, "Stability certification of large scale stochastic systems using dissipativity of subsystems", Automatica, vol. 48, pp. 2956-2964, 2012. pdf
    Abstract

    This paper deals with the stability of interconnections of nonlinear stochastic systems, using concepts of passivity and noise-to-state stability.

2011
  1. E.D. Sontag, "Input to State Stability", In The Control Systems Handbook: Control System Advanced Methods, Second Edition., pp. 45.1-45.21 (1034-1054), 2011. pdf
    Abstract

    An encyclopedia-type article on foundations of ISS.

2004
  1. D. Angeli, B.P. Ingalls, E.D. Sontag, Y. Wang, "Separation principles for input-output and integral-input-to-state stability", SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 256–276, 2004. doipdf
    Abstract

    We present new characterizations of input-output-to-state stability. This is a notion of detectability formulated in the ISS framework. Equivalent properties are presented in terms of asymptotic estimates of the state trajectories based on the magnitudes of the external input and output signals. These results provide a set of "separation principles" for input-output-to-state stability , characterizations of the property in terms of weaker stability notions. When applied to the closely related notion of integral ISS, these characterizations yield analogous results.

  2. M. Malisoff, E.D. Sontag, "Asymptotic controllability and input-to-state stabilization: the effect of actuator errors", In Optimal control, stabilization and nonsmooth analysis, pp. 155–171, 2004. pdf
    Abstract

    We discuss several issues related to the stabilizability of nonlinear systems. First, for continuously stabilizable systems, we review constructions of feedbacks that render the system input-to-state stable with respect to actuator errors. Then, we discuss a recent paper which provides a new feedback design that makes globally asymptotically controllable systems input-to-state stable to actuator errors and small observation noise. We illustrate our constructions using the nonholonomic integrator, and discuss a related feedback design for systems with disturbances.

2003
  1. D. Angeli, E.D. Sontag, Y. Wang, "Input-to-state stability with respect to inputs and their derivatives", Internat. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1035–1056, 2003. pdf
    Abstract

    A new notion of input-to-state stability involving infinity norms of input derivatives up to a finite order k is introduced and characterized. An example shows that this notion of stability is indeed weaker than the usual ISS. Applications to the study of global asymptotic stability of cascaded nonlinear systems are discussed.

2002
  1. M. Arcak, D. Angeli, E.D. Sontag, "A unifying integral ISS framework for stability of nonlinear cascades", SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1888–1904, 2002. doipdf
    Abstract

    We analyze nonlinear cascades in which the driven subsystem is integral ISS, and characterize the admissible integral ISS gains for stability. This characterization makes use of the convergence speed of the driving subsystem, and allows a larger class of gain functions when the convergence is faster. We show that our integral ISS gain characterization unifies different approaches in the literature which restrict the nonlinear growth of the driven subsystem and the convergence speed of the driving subsystem.

  2. D. Liberzon, E.D. Sontag, Y. Wang, "Universal construction of feedback laws achieving ISS and integral-ISS disturbance attenuation", Systems Control Lett., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 111–127, 2002. pdf
    Errata here: http://sontaglab.org/FTPDIR/iiss-clf-errata.pdf
    Abstract

    We study nonlinear systems with both control and disturbance inputs. The main problem addressed in the paper is design of state feedback control laws that render the closed-loop system integral-input-to-state stable (iISS) with respect to the disturbances. We introduce an appropriate concept of control Lyapunov function (iISS-CLF), whose existence leads to an explicit construction of such a control law. The same method applies to the problem of input-to-state stabilization. Converse results and techniques for generating iISS-CLFs are also discussed.

  3. E.D. Sontag, B.P. Ingalls, "A small-gain theorem with applications to input/output systems, incremental stability, detectability, and interconnections", J. Franklin Inst., vol. 339, no. 2, pp. 211–229, 2002. pdf
    Abstract

    A general ISS-type small-gain result is presented. It specializes to a small-gain theorem for ISS operators, and it also recovers the classical statement for ISS systems in state-space form. In addition, we highlight applications to incrementally stable systems, detectable systems, and to interconnections of stable systems.

2001
  1. D. Angeli, E.D. Sontag, Y. Wang, "A note on input-to-state stability with input derivatives", In Proc.\ Nonlinear Control System Design Symposium, St.\ Petersburg, July 2001, pp. 720–725, 2001.
  2. E.D. Sontag, B.P. Ingalls, Y. Wang, "Generalizations of asymptotic gain characterizations of ISS to input-to-output stability", In Proc.\ American Control Conf., Arlington, June 2001, pp. 2279–2284, 2001.
  3. E.D. Sontag, "The ISS philosophy as a unifying framework for stability-like behavior", In Nonlinear control in the year 2000, Vol.\ 2 (Paris), pp. 443–467, 2001. pdf
    Abstract

    (This is an expository paper prepared for a plenary talk given at the Second Nonlinear Control Network Workshop, Paris, June 9, 2000.) The input to state stability (ISS) paradigm is motivated as a generalization of classical linear systems concepts under coordinate changes. A summary is provided of the main theoretical results concerning ISS and related notions of input/output stability and detectability. A bibliography is also included, listing extensions, applications, and other current work.

2000
  1. D. Angeli, E.D. Sontag, Y. Wang, "Further equivalences and semiglobal versions of integral input to state stability", Dynamics and Control, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 127–149, 2000. doipdf
    Abstract

    This paper continues the study of the integral input-to-state stability (IISS) property. It is shown that the IISS property is equivalent to one which arises from the consideration of mixed norms on states and inputs, as well as to the superposition of a ``bounded energy bounded state'' requirement and the global asymptotic stability of the unforced system. A semiglobal version of IISS is shown to imply the global version, though a counterexample shows that the analogous fact fails for input to state stability (ISS). The results in this note complete the basic theoretical picture regarding IISS and ISS.

  2. D. Angeli, E.D. Sontag, Y. Wang, "A characterization of integral input-to-state stability", IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1082–1097, 2000. pdf
    Abstract

    Just as input to state stability (ISS) generalizes the idea of finite gains with respect to supremum norms, the new notion of integral input to state stability (IISS) generalizes the concept of finite gain when using an integral norm on inputs. In this paper, we obtain a necessary and sufficient characterization of the IISS property, expressed in terms of dissipation inequalities.

  3. X. Bao, Z. Lin, E.D. Sontag, "Finite gain stabilization of discrete-time linear systems subject to actuator saturation", Automatica, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 269–277, 2000. pdf
    Abstract

    It is shown that, for neutrally stable discrete-time linear systems subject to actuator saturation, finite gain lp stabilization can be achieved by linear output feedback, for all p>1. An explicit construction of the corresponding feedback laws is given. The feedback laws constructed also result in a closed-loop system that is globally asymptotically stable, and in an input-to-state estimate.

1999
  1. L. Grüne, E.D. Sontag, F.R. Wirth, "Asymptotic stability equals exponential stability, and ISS equals finite energy gain–if you twist your eyes", Systems Control Lett., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 127–134, 1999. pdf
    Abstract

    This paper shows that uniformly global asymptotic stability for a family of ordinary differential equations is equivalent to uniformly global exponential stability under a suitable nonlinear change of variables. The same is shown respectively for input-to-state stability, input-to-state exponential stability, and the property of finite square-norm gain ("nonlinear H-infty"). The results are shown for systems of any dimension not equal to 4 or 5.

  2. Z-P. Jiang, E.D. Sontag, Y. Wang, "Input-to-state stability for discrete-time nonlinear systems", In Proc.\ 14th IFAC World Congress, Vol E (Beijing), pp. 277–282, 1999. pdf
    Abstract

    This paper studies the input-to-state stability (ISS) property for discrete-time nonlinear systems. We show that many standard ISS results may be extended to the discrete-time case. More precisely, we provide a Lyapunov-like sufficient condition for ISS, and we show the equivalence between the ISS property and various other properties, as well as provide a small gain theorem.

  3. M. Krichman, E.D. Sontag, Y. Wang, "Lyapunov characterizations of input-ouput-to-state stability", In Proc.\ IEEE Conf.\ Decision and Control, Phoenix, Dec.\ 1999, IEEE Publications, 1999, pp. 2070–2075, 1999.
  4. D. Liberzon, E.D. Sontag, Y. Wang, "On integral-input-to-state stabilization", In Proc.\ American Control Conf.\/, San Diego, June 1999, pp. 1598–1602, 1999. pdf
    Abstract

    This paper continues the investigation of the recently introduced integral version of input-to-state stability (iISS). We study the problem of designing control laws that achieve iISS disturbance attenuation. The main contribution is an appropriate concept of control Lyapunov function (iISS-CLF), whose existence leads to an explicit construction of such a control law. The results are compared and contrasted with the ones available for the ISS case.

  5. D. Nesi\'c, A.R. Teel, E.D. Sontag, "Formulas relating KL stability estimates of discrete-time and sampled-data nonlinear systems", Systems Control Lett., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 49–60, 1999. pdf
    Abstract

    We provide an explicit KL stability or input-to-state stability (ISS) estimate for a sampled-data nonlinear system in terms of the KL estimate for the corresponding discrete-time system and a K function describing inter-sample growth. It is quite obvious that a uniform inter-sample growth condition, plus an ISS property for the exact discrete-time model of a closed-loop system, implies uniform ISS of the sampled-data nonlinear system; our results serve to quantify these facts by means of comparison functions. Our results can be used as an alternative to prove and extend results of Aeyels et al and extend some results by Chen et al to a class of nonlinear systems. Finally, the formulas we establish can be used as a tool for some other problems which we indicate.

  6. E.D. Sontag, Y. Wang, "Notions of input to output stability", Systems Control Lett., vol. 38, no. 4-5, pp. 235–248, 1999. pdf
    Abstract

    This paper deals with several related notions of output stability with respect to inputs (which may be thought of as disturbances). The main such notion is called input to output stability (IOS), and it reduces to input to state stability (ISS) when the output equals the complete state. For systems with no inputs, IOS provides a generalization of the classical concept of partial stability. Several variants, which formalize in different manners the transient behavior, are introduced. The main results provide a comparison among these notions

1998
  1. D. Nesi\'c, E.D. Sontag, "Input-to-state stabilization of linear systems with positive outputs", Systems Control Lett., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 245–255, 1998. pdf
    Abstract

    This paper considers the problem of stabilization of linear systems for which only the magnitudes of outputs are measured. It is shown that, if a system is controllable and observable, then one can find a stabilizing controller, which is robust with respect to observation noise (in the ISS sense).

  2. E.D. Sontag, "Comments on integral variants of ISS", Systems Control Lett., vol. 34, no. 1-2, pp. 93–100, 1998. doipdf
    Abstract

    This note discusses two integral variants of the input-to-state stability (ISS) property, which represent nonlinear generalizations of L2 stability, in much the same way that ISS generalizes L-infinity stability. Both variants are equivalent to ISS for linear systems. For general nonlinear systems, it is shown that one of the new properties is strictly weaker than ISS, while the other one is equivalent to it. For bilinear systems, a complete characterization is provided of the weaker property. An interesting fact about functions of type KL is proved as well.

  3. E.D. Sontag, "Notions of integral input-to-state stability", In Proc.\ American Control Conf.\/, Philadelphia, June 1998, pp. 3215–321, 1998.
1996
  1. E.D. Sontag, Y. Wang, "New characterizations of input-to-state stability", IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1283–1294, 1996. pdf
    Abstract

    We present new characterizations of the Input to State Stability property. As a consequence of these results, we show the equivalence between the ISS property and several (apparent) variations proposed in the literature.

  2. E.D. Sontag, Y. Wang, "Detectability of nonlinear systems", In Proc.\ Conf.\ on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS 96)\/, Princeton, NJ, pp. 1031–1036, 1996. pdf
    Abstract

    Contains a proof of a technical step, which was omitted from the journal paper due to space constraints

1995
  1. Y. Lin, E.D. Sontag, Y. Wang, "Input to state stabilizability for parametrized families of systems", Internat. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 187–205, 1995. pdf
    Abstract

    This paper studies various stability issues for parameterized families of systems, including problems of stabilization with respect to sets. The study of such families is motivated by robust control applications. A Lyapunov-theoretic necessary and sufficient characterization is obtained for a natural notion of robust uniform set stability; this characterization allows replacing ad hoc conditions found in the literature by more conceptual stability notions. We then use these techniques to establish a result linking state space stability to ``input to state'' (bounded-input bounded-state) stability. In addition, the preservation of stabilizability under certain types of cascade interconnections is analyzed.

  2. E.D. Sontag, Y. Wang, "On characterizations of the input-to-state stability property", Systems Control Lett., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 351–359, 1995. doipdf
    Abstract

    We show that the well-known Lyapunov sufficient condition for input-to-state stability is also necessary, settling positively an open question raised by several authors during the past few years. Additional characterizations of the ISS property, including one in terms of nonlinear stability margins, are also provided.

  3. E.D. Sontag, "On the input-to-state stability property", European J.\ Control, vol. 1, pp. 24–36, 1995. pdf
    Abstract

    The "input to state stability" (ISS) property provides a natural framework in which to formulate notions of stability with respect to input perturbations. In this expository paper, we review various equivalent definitions expressed in stability, Lyapunov-theoretic, and dissipation terms. We sketch some applications to the stabilization of cascades of systems and of linear systems subject to control saturation.

  4. E.D. Sontag, Y. Wang, "On characterizations of input-to-state stability with respect to compact sets", In Proceedings of IFAC Non-Linear Control Systems Design Symposium, (NOLCOS '95)\/, Tahoe City, CA, June 1995, pp. 226–231, 1995. pdf
    Abstract

    Previous characterizations of ISS-stability are shown to generalize without change to the case of stability with respect to sets. Some results on ISS-stabilizability are mentioned as well.

  5. E.D. Sontag, Y. Wang, "Various results concerning set input-to-state stability", In Proc.\ IEEE Conf.\ Decision and Control, New Orleans, Dec.\ 1995, IEEE Publications, 1995, pp. 1330–1335, 1995.
1994
  1. E.D. Sontag, Y. Wang, "Notions equivalent to input-to-state stability", In Proc.\ IEEE Conf.\ Decision and Control, Orlando, Dec.\ 1994, IEEE Publications, 1994, pp. 3438–3443, 1994.
1990
  1. E.D. Sontag, "Further facts about input to state stabilization", IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 473–476, 1990. pdf
    Abstract

    Previous results about input to state stabilizability are shown to hold even for systems which are not linear in controls, provided that a more general type of feedback be allowed. Applications to certain stabilization problems and coprime factorizations, as well as comparisons to other results on input to state stability, are also briefly discussed.d local minima may occur, if the data are not separable and sigmoids are used.

1989
  1. E.D. Sontag, "Remarks on stabilization and input-to-state stability", In Proceedings of the 28th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Vol.\ 1–3 (Tampa, FL, 1989), pp. 1376–1378, 1989. pdf
    Abstract

    This paper describes how notions of input-to-state stabilization are useful when stabilizing cascades of systems. The simplest result along these lines is local, and it states that a cascade of two locally asymptotically stable systems is again asystable. A global result is obtained if both systems have the origin as a globally asymptotically stable state and the "converging input bounded state" property holds for the second system. Relations to input to state stability and the "bounded input bounded state" property as mentioned as well.